|
| IN
the following pages I offer nothing more than simple
facts, plain arguments, and common sense; and have no
other preliminaries to settle with the reader, than that
he will divest himself of prejudice and prepossession,
and suffer his reason and his feelings to determine for
themselves; that he will put on, or rather that he will
not put off, the true character of a man, and generously
enlarge his views beyond the present day. |
1 |
| Volumes
have been written on the subject of the struggle between
England and America. Men of all ranks have embarked in
the controversy, from different motives, and with various
designs; but all have been ineffectual, and the period of
debate is closed. Arms, as the last resource, decide the
contest; the appeal was the choice of the king, and the
continent hath accepted the challenge. |
2 |
| It
hath been reported of the late Mr Pelham (who tho' an
able minister was not without his faults) that on his
being attacked in the house of commons, on the score,
that his measures were only of a temporary kind, replied,
"they will last my time." Should a thought so
fatal and unmanly possess the colonies in the present
contest, the name of ancestors will be remembered by
future generations with detestation. |
3 |
| The
sun never shined on a cause of greater worth. 'Tis not
the affair of a city, a country, a province, or a
kingdom, but of a continentof at least one eighth
part of the habitable globe. 'Tis not the concern of a
day, a year, or an age; posterity are virtually involved
in the contest, and will be more or less affected, even
to the end of time, by the proceedings now. Now is the
seed time of continental union, faith and honor. The
least fracture now will be like a name engraved with the
point of a pin on the tender rind of a young oak; The
wound will enlarge with the tree, and posterity read it
in full grown characters. |
4 |
| By
referring the matter from argument to arms, a new æra
for politics is struck; a new method of thinking hath
arisen. All plans, proposals, &c. prior to the
nineteenth of April, i. e. to the commencement of
hostilities, are like the almanacks of the last year;
which, though proper then, are superceded and useless
now. Whatever was advanced by the advocates on either
side of the question then, terminated in one and the same
point, viz. a union with Great-Britain; the only
difference between the parties was the method of
effecting it; the one proposing force, the other
friendship; but it hath so far happened that the first
hath failed, and the second hath withdrawn her influence. |
5 |
| As
much hath been said of the advantages of reconciliation,
which, like an agreeable dream, hath passed away and left
us as we were, it is but right, that we should examine
the contrary side of the argument, and inquire into some
of the many material injuries which these colonies
sustain, and always will sustain, by being connected
with, and dependant on Great-Britain. To examine that
connexion and dependance, on the principles of nature and
common sense, to see what we have to trust to, if
separated, and what we are to expect, if dependant. |
6 |
| I
have heard it asserted by some, that as America hath
flourished under her former connexion with Great-Britain,
that the same connexion is necessary towards her future
happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing
can be more fallacious than this kind of argument. We may
as well assert that because a child has thrived upon
milk, that it is never to have meat, or that the first
twenty years of our lives is to become a precedent for
the next twenty. But even this is admitting more than is
true, for I answer roundly, that America would have
flourished as much, and probably much more, had no
European power had any thing to do with her. The
commerce, by which she hath enriched herself are the
necessaries of life, and will always have a market while
eating is the custom of Europe. |
7 |
| But
she has protected us, say some. That she hath engrossed
us is true, and defended the continent at our expence as
well as her own is admitted, and she would have defended
Turkey from the same motive, viz. the sake of trade and
dominion. |
8 |
| Alas,
we have been long led away by ancient prejudices, and
made large sacrifices to superstition. We have boasted
the protection of Great-Britain, without considering,
that her motive was interest not attachment; that she did
not protect us from our enemies on our account, but from
her enemies on her own account, from those who had no
quarrel with us on any other account, and who will always
be our enemies on the same account. Let Britain wave her
pretensions to the continent, or the continent throw off
the dependance, and we should be at peace with France and
Spain were they at war with Britain. The miseries of
Hanover last war ought to warn us against connexions. |
9 |
| It
hath lately been asserted in parliament, that the
colonies have no relation to each other but through the
parent country, i. e. that Pennsylvania and the Jerseys,
and so on for the rest, are sister colonies by the way of
England; this is certainly a very round-about way of
proving relationship, but it is the nearest and only true
way of proving enemyship, if I may so call it. France and
Spain never were, nor perhaps ever will be our enemies as
Americans, but as our being the subjects of
Great-Britain. |
10 |
| But
Britain is the parent country, say some. Then the more
shame upon her conduct. Even brutes do not devour their
young, nor savages make war upon their families;
wherefore the assertion, if true, turns to her reproach;
but it happens not to be true, or only partly so, and the
phrase parent or mother country hath been jesuitically
adopted by the king and his parasites, with a low
papistical design of gaining an unfair bias on the
credulous weakness of our minds. Europe, and not England,
is the parent country of America. This new world hath
been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and
religious liberty from every part of Europe. Hither have
they fled, not from the tender embraces of the mother,
but from the cruelty of the monster; and it is so far
true of England, that the same tyranny which drove the
first emigrants from home, pursues their descendants
still. |
11 |
| In
this extensive quarter of the globe, we forget the narrow
limits of three hundred and sixty miles (the extent of
England) and carry our friendship on a larger scale; we
claim brotherhood with every European christian, and
triumph in the generosity of the sentiment. |
12 |
| It
is pleasant to observe by what regular gradations we
surmount the force of local prejudice, as we enlarge our
acquaintance with the world. A man born in any town in
England divided into parishes, will naturally associate
most with his fellow parishioners (because their
interests in many cases will be common) and distinguish
him by the name of neighbour; if he meet him but a few
miles from home, he drops the narrow idea of a street,
and salutes him by the name of townsman; if he travel out
of the county, and meet him in any other, he forgets the
minor divisions of street and town, and calls him
countryman; i. e. county-man; but if in their foreign
excursions they should associate in France or any other
part of Europe, their local remembrance would be enlarged
into that of Englishmen. And by a just parity of
reasoning, all Europeans meeting in America, or any other
quarter of the globe, are countrymen; for England,
Holland, Germany, or Sweden, when compared with the
whole, stand in the same places on the larger scale,
which the divisions of street, town, and county do on the
smaller ones; distinctions too limited for continental
minds. Not one third of the inhabitants, even of this
province, are of English descent. Wherefore I reprobate
the phrase of parent or mother country applied to England
only, as being false, selfish, narrow and ungenerous. |
13 |
| But
admitting, that we were all of English descent, what does
it amount to? Nothing. Britain, being now anenemy,
extinguishes every other name and title: And to say that
reconciliation is our duty, is truly farcical. The first
king of England, of the present line (William the
Conqueror) was a Frenchman, and half the Peers of England
are descendants from the same country; wherefore, by the
same method of reasoning, England ought to be governed by
France. |
14 |
| Much
hath been said of the united strength of Britain and the
colonies, that in conjunction they might bid defiance to
the world. But this is mere presumption; the fate of war
is uncertain, neither do the expressions mean any thing;
for this continent would never suffer itself to be
drained of inhabitants, to support the British arms in
either Asia, Africa, or Europe. |
15 |
| Besides,
what have we to do with setting the world at defiance?
Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to, will
secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe;
because, it is the interest of all Europe to have America
a free port. Her trade will always be a protection, and
her barrenness of gold and silver secure her from
invaders. |
16 |
| I
challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to
shew, a single advantage that this continent can reap, by
being connected with Great Britain. I repeat the
challenge, not a single advantage is derived. Our corn
will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our
imported goods must be paid for buy them where we will. |
17 |
| But
the injuries and disadvantages we sustain by that
connection, are without number; and our duty to mankind
at large, as well as to ourselves, instruct us to
renounce the alliance: Because, any submission to, or
dependance on Great-Britain, tends directly to involve
this continent in European wars and quarrels; and sets us
at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our
friendship, and against whom, we have neither anger nor
complaint. As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to
form no partial connection with any part of it. It is the
true interest of America to steer clear of European
contentions, which she never can do, while by her
dependance on Britain, she is made the make-weight in the
scale on British politics. |
18 |
| Europe
is too thickly planted with kingdoms to be long at peace,
and whenever a war breaks out between England and any
foreign power, the trade of America goes to ruin, because
of her connection with Britain. The next war may not turn
out like the last, and should it not, the advocates for
reconciliation now will be wishing for separation then,
because, neutrality in that case, would be a safer convoy
than a man of war. Every thing that is right or natural
pleads for separation. The blood of the slain, the
weeping voice of nature cries, 'TIS TIME TO PART. Even
the distance at which the Almighty hath placed England
and America, is a strong and natural proof, that the
authority of the one, over the other, was never the
design of Heaven. The time likewise at which the
continent was discovered, adds weight to the argument,
and the manner in which it was peopled encreases the
force of it. The reformation was preceded by the
discovery of America, as if the Almighty graciously meant
toa sanctuary to the persecuted in future years,
when home should afford neither friendship nor safety. |
19 |
| The
authority of Great-Britain over this continent, is a form
of government, which sooner or later must have an end:
And a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking
forward, under the painful and positive conviction, that
what he calls "the present constitution" is
merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing
that this government is not sufficiently lasting to
ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And
by a plain method of argument, as we are running the next
generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it,
otherwise we use them meanly and pitifully. In order to
discover the line of our duty rightly, we should take our
children in our hand, and fix our station a few years
farther into life; that eminence will present a prospect,
which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our
sight. |
20 |
| Though
I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I
am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the
doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the
following descriptions. Interested men, who are not to be
trusted; weak men, who cannot see; prejudiced men, who
will not see; and a certain set of moderate men, who
think better of the European world than it deserves; and
this last class, by an ill-judged deliberation, will be
the cause of more calamities to this continent, than all
the other three. |
21 |
| It
is the good fortune of many to live distant from the
scene of sorrow; the evil is not sufficiently brought to
their doors to make them feel the precariousness with
which all American property is possessed. But let our
imaginations transport us for a few moments to Boston,
that seat of wretchedness will teach us wisdom, and
instruct us for ever to renounce a power in whom we can
have no trust. The inhabitants of that unfortunate city,
who but a few months ago were in ease and affluence, have
now, no other alternative than to stay and starve, or
turn out to beg. Endangered by the fire of their friends
if they continue within the city, and plundered by the
soldiery if they leave it. In their present condition
they are prisoners without the hope of redemption, and in
a general attack for their relief, they would be exposed
to the fury of both armies. |
22 |
| Men
of passive tempers look somewhat lightly over the
offences of Britain, and, still hoping for the best, are
apt to call out, "Come, come, we shall be friends
again, for all this." But examine the passions and
feelings of mankind, Bring the doctrine of reconciliation
to the touchstone of nature, and then tell me, whether
you can hereafter love, honour, and faithfully serve the
power that hath carried fire and sword into your land? If
you cannot do all these, then are you only deceiving
yourselves, and by your delay bringing ruin upon
posterity. Your future connection with Britain, whom you
can neither love nor honour, will be forced and
unnatural, and being formed only on the plan of present
convenience, will in a little time fall into a relapse
more wretched than the first. But if you say, you can
still pass the violations over, then I ask, Hath your
house been burnt? Hath your property been destroyed
before your face? Are your wife and children destitute of
a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have you lost a
parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the ruined
and wretched survivor? If you have not, then are you not
a judge of those who have. But if you have, and still can
shake hands with the murderers, then you are unworthy of
the name of husband, father, friend, or lover, and
whatever may be your rank or title in life, you have the
heart of a coward, and the spirit of a sycophant. |
23 |
| This
is not inflaming or exaggerating matters, but trying them
by those feelings and affections which nature justifies,
and without which, we should be incapable of discharging
the social duties of life, or enjoying the felicities of
it. I mean not to exhibit horror for the purpose of
provoking revenge, but to awaken us from fatal and
unmanly slumbers, that we may pursue determinately some
fixed object. It is not in the power of Britain or of
Europe to conquer America, if she do not conquer herself
by delay and timidity. The present winter is worth an age
if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole
continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no
punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or
what, or where he will, that may be the means of
sacrificing a season so precious and useful. |
24 |
| It
is repugnant to reason, to the universal order of things
to all examples from former ages, to suppose, that this
continent can longer remain subject to any external
power. The most sanguine in Britain does not think so.
The utmost stretch of human wisdom cannot, at this time,
compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the
continent even a year's security. Reconciliation is now a
falacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connexion, and
Art cannot supply her place. For, as Milton wisely
expresses, "never can true reconcilement grow where
wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep." |
25 |
| Every
quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers
have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to
convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms
obstinacy in Kings more than repeated
petitioningand noting hath contributed more than
that very measure to make the Kings of Europe absolute:
Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore, since nothing but
blows will do, for God's sake, let us come to a final
separation, and not leave the next generation to be
cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of
parent and child. |
26 |
| To
say, they will never attempt it again is idle and
visionary, we thought so at the repeal of the stamp act,
yet a year or two undeceived us; as well may we suppose
that nations, which have been once defeated, will never
renew the quarrel. |
27 |
| As
to government matters, it is not in the power of Britain
to do this continent justice: The business of it will
soon be too weighty, and intricate, to be managed with
any tolerable degree of convenience, by a power, so
distant from us, and so very ignorant of us; for if they
cannot conquer us, they cannot govern us. To be always
running three or four thousand miles with a tale or a
petition, waiting four or five months for an answer,
which when obtained requires five or six more to explain
it in, will in a few years be looked upon as folly and
childishnessThere was a time when it was proper,
and there is a proper time for it to cease. |
28 |
| Small
islands not capable of protecting themselves, are the
proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but
there is something very absurd, in supposing a continent
to be perpetually governed by an island. In no instance
hath nature made the satellite larger than its primary
planet, and as England and America, with respect to each
other, reverses the common order of nature, it is evident
they belong to different systems: England to Europe,
America to itself. |
29 |
| I
am not induced by motives of pride, party, or resentment
to espouse the doctrine of separation and independance; I
am clearly, positively, and conscientiously persuaded
that it is the true interest of this continent to be so;
that every thing short of that is mere patchwork, that it
can afford no lasting felicity,that it is leaving
the sword to our children, and shrinking back at a time,
when, a little more, a little farther, would have
rendered this continent the glory of the earth. |
30 |
| As
Britain hath not manifested the least inclination towards
a compromise, we may be assured that no terms can be
obtained worthy the acceptance of the continent, or any
ways equal to the expense of blood and treasure we have
been already put to. |
31 |
| The
object, contended for, ought always to bear some just
proportion to the expense. The removal of North, or the
whole detestable junto, is a matter unworthy the millions
we have expended. A temporary stoppage of trade, was an
inconvenience, which would have sufficiently ballanced
the repeal of all the acts complained of, had such
repeals been obtained; but if the whole continent must
take up arms, if every man must be a soldier, it is
scarcely worth our while to fight against a contemptible
ministry only. Dearly, dearly, do we pay for the repeal
of the acts, if that is all we fight for; for in a just
estimation, it is as great a folly to pay a Bunker-hill
price for law, as for land. As I have always considered
the independancy of this continent, as an event, which
sooner or later must arrive, so from the late rapid
progress of the continent to maturity, the event could
not be far off. Wherefore, on the breaking out of
hostilities, it was not worth the while to have disputed
a matter, which time would have finally redressed, unless
we meant to be in earnest; otherwise, it is like wasting
an estate on a suit at law, to regulate the trespasses of
a tenant, whose lease is just expiring. No man was a
warmer wisher for reconciliation than myself, before the
fatal nineteenth of April 1775, 1 but the moment the
event of that day was made known, I rejected the
hardened, sullen tempered Pharaoh of England for ever;
and disdain the wretch, that with the pretended title of
FATHER OF HIS PEOPLE, can unfeelingly hear of their
slaughter, and composedly sleep with their blood upon his
soul. |
32 |
| But
admitting that matters were now made up, what would be
the event? I answer, the ruin of the continent. And that
for several reasons. |
33 |
| First.
The powers of governing still remaining in the hands of
the king, he will have a negative over the whole
legislation of this continent. And as he hath shewn
himself such an inveterate enemy to liberty, and
discovered such a thirst for arbitrary power; is he, or
is he not, a proper man to say to these colonies,
"You shall make no laws but what I please." And
is there any inhabitant in America so ignorant, as not to
know, that according to what is called the present
constitution, that this continent can make no laws but
what the king gives it leave to; and is there any man so
unwise, as not to see, that (considering what has
happened) he will suffer no law to be made here, but such
as suit his purpose. We may be as effectually enslaved by
the want of laws in America, as by submitting to laws
made for us in England. After matters are made up (as it
is called) can there be any doubt, but the whole power of
the crown will be exerted, to keep this continent as low
and humble as possible? Instead of going forward we shall
go backward, or be perpetually quarrelling or
ridiculously petitioning.We are already greater
than the king wishes us to be, and will he not hereafter
endeavour to make us less? To bring the matter to one
point. Is the power who is jealous of our prosperity, a
proper power to govern us? Whoever says No to this
question is an independant, for independancy means no
more, than, whether we shall make our own laws, or,
whether the king, the greatest enemy this continent hath,
or can have, shall tell us, "there shall be no laws
but such as I like." |
34 |
| But
the king you will say has a negative in England; the
people there can make no laws without his consent. In
point of right and good order, there is something very
ridiculous, that a youth of twenty-one (which hath often
happened) shall say to several millions of people, older
and wiser than himself, I forbid this or that act of
yours to be law. But in this place I decline this sort of
reply, though I will never cease to expose the absurdity
of it, and only answer, that England being the King's
residence, and America not so, make quite another case.
The king's negative here is ten times more dangerous and
fatal than it can be in England, for there he will
scarcely refuse his consent to a bill for putting England
into as strong a state of defence as possible, and in
America he would never suffer such a bill to be passed. |
35 |
| America
is only a secondary object in the system of British
politics, England consults the good of this country, no
farther than it answers her own purpose. Wherefore, her
own interest leads her to suppress the growth of ours in
every case which doth not promote her advantage, or in
the least interferes with it. A pretty state we should
soon be in under such a second-hand government,
considering what has happened! Men do not change from
enemies to friends by the alteration of a name: And in
order to shew that reconciliation now is a dangerous
doctrine, I affirm, that it would be policy in the king
at this time, to repeal the acts for the sake of
reinstating himself in the government of the provinces;
in order that HE MAY ACCOMPLISH BY CRAFT AND SUBTILITY,
IN THE LONG RUN, WHAT HE CANNOT DO BY FORCE AND VIOLENCE
IN THE SHORT ONE. Reconciliation and ruin are nearly
related. |
36 |
| Secondly.
That as even the best terms, which we can expect to
obtain, can amount to no more than a temporary expedient,
or a kind of government by guardianship, which can last
no longer than till the colonies come of age, so the
general face and state of things, in the interim, will be
unsettled and unpromising. Emigrants of property will not
choose to come to a country whose form of government
hangs but by a thread, and who is every day tottering on
the brink of commotion and disturbance; and numbers of
the present inhabitants would lay hold of the interval,
to dispose of their effects, and quit the continent. |
37 |
| But
the most powerful of all arguments, is, that nothing but
independance, i. e. a continental form of government, can
keep the peace of the continent and preserve it inviolate
from civil wars. I dread the event of a reconciliation
with Britain now, as it is more than probable, that it
will followed by a revolt somewhere or other, the
consequences of which may be far more fatal than all the
malice of Britain. |
38 |
| Thousands
are already ruined by British barbarity; (thousands more
will probably suffer the same fate.) Those men have other
feelings than us who have nothing suffered. All they now
possess is liberty, what they before enjoyed is
sacrificed to its service, and having nothing more to
lose, they disdain submission. Besides, the general
temper of the colonies, towards a British government,
will be like that of a youth, who is nearly out of his
time; they will care very little about her. And a
government which cannot preserve the peace, is no
government at all, and in that case we pay our money for
nothing; and pray what is it that Britain can do, whose
power will be wholly on paper, should a civil tumult
break out the very day after reconciliation? I have heard
some men say, many of whom I believe spoke without
thinking, that they dreaded an independance, fearing that
it would produce civil wars. It is but seldom that our
first thoughts are truly correct, and that is the case
here; for there are ten times more to dread from a
patched up connexion than from independance. I make the
sufferers case my own, and I protest, that were I driven
from house and home, my property destroyed, and my
circumstances ruined, that as a man, sensible of
injuries, I could never relish the doctrine of
reconciliation, or consider myself bound thereby. |
39 |
| The
colonies have manifested such a spirit of good order and
obedience to continental government, as is sufficient to
make every reasonable person easy and happy on that head.
No man can assign the least pretence for his fears, on
any other grounds, that such as are truly childish and
ridiculous, viz. that one colony will be striving for
superiority over another. |
40 |
| Where
there are no distinctions there can be no superiority,
perfect equality affords no temptation. The republics of
Europe are all (and we may say always) in peace. Holland
and Swisserland are without wars, foreign or domestic:
Monarchical governments, it is true, are never long at
rest; the crown itself is a temptation to enterprizing
ruffians at home; and that degree of pride and insolence
ever attendant on regal authority, swells into a rupture
with foreign powers, in instances, where a republican
government, by being formed on more natural principles,
would negotiate the mistake. |
41 |
| If
there is any true cause of fear respecting independance,
it is because no plan is yet laid down. Men do not see
their way outWherefore, as anng into that
business, I offer the following hints; at the same time
modestly affirming, that I have no other opinion of them
myself, than that they may be the means of giving rise to
something better. Could the straggling thoughts of
individuals be collected, they would frequently form
materials for wise and able men to improve into useful
matter. |
42 |
| Let
the assemblies be annual, with a President only. The
representation more equal. Their business wholly
domestic, and subject to the authority of a Continental
Congress. |
43 |
| Let
each colony be divided into six, eight, or ten,
convenient districts, each district to send a proper
number of delegates to Congress, so that each colony send
at least thirty. The whole number in Congress will be
least 390. Each Congress to sit and to choose a president
by the following method. When the delegates are met, let
a colony be taken from the whole thirteen colonies by
lot, after which, let the whole Congress choose (by
ballot) a president from out of the delegates of that
province. In the next Congress, let a colony be taken by
lot from twelve only, omitting that colony from which the
president was taken in the former Congress, and so
proceeding on till the whole thirteen shall have had
their proper rotation. And in order that nothing may pass
into a law but what is satisfactorily just, not less than
three fifths of the Congress to be called a
majority.He that will promote discord, under a
government so equally formed as this, would have joined
Lucifer in his revolt. |
44 |
| But
as there is a peculiar delicacy, from whom, or in what
manner, this business must first arise, and as it seems
most agreeable and consistent that it should come from
some intermediate body between the governed and the
governors, that is, between the Congress and the people,
let a CONTINENTAL CONFERENCE be held, in the following
manner, and for the following purpose. |
45 |
| A
committee of twenty-six members of Congress, viz. two for
each colony. Two members for each House of Assembly, or
Provincial Convention; and five representatives of the
people at large, to be chosen in the capital city or town
of each province, for, and in behalf of the whole
province, by as many qualified voters as shall think
proper to attend from all parts of the province for that
purpose; or, if more convenient, the representatives may
be chosen in two or three of the most populous parts
thereof. In this conference, thus assembled, will be
united, the two grand principles of business, knowledge
and power. The members of Congress, Assemblies, or
Conventions, by having had experience in national
concerns, will be able and useful counsellors, and the
whole, being impowered by the people, will have a truly
legal authority |
46 |
| The
conferring members being met, let their business be to
frame a CONTINENTAL CHARTER, or Charter of the United
Colonies; (answering to what is called the Magna Charta
of England) fixing the number and manner of choosing
members of Congress, members of Assembly, with their date
of sitting, and drawing the line of business and
jurisdiction between them: (Always remembering, that our
strength is continental, not provincial:) Securing
freedom and property to all men, and above all things,
the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates
of conscience; with such other matter as is necessary for
a charter to contain. Immediately after which, the said
Conference to dissolve, and the bodies which shall be
chosen comformable to the said charter, to be the
legislators and governors of this continent for the time
being: Whose peace and happiness, may God preserve, Amen.
|
47 |
| Should
any body of men be hereafter delegated for this or some
similar purpose, I offer them the following extracts from
that wise observer on governments Dragonetti. "The
science" says he "of the politician consists in
fixing the true point of happiness and freedom. Those men
would deserve the gratitude of ages, who should discover
a mode of government that contained the greatest sum of
individual happiness, with the least national expense.
Dragonetti on virtue and rewards." |
48 |
| But
where says some is the King of America? I'll tell you
Friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of
mankind like the Royal Brute of Britain. Yet that we may
not appear to be defective even in earthly honors, let a
day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter;
let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the
word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the
world may know, that so far as we approve as monarchy,
that in America THE LAW IS KING. For as in absolute
governments the King is law, so in free countries the law
ought to be King; and there ought to be no other. But
lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the crown
at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and
scattered among the people whose right it is. |
49 |
| A
government of our own is our natural right: And when a
man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human
affairs, he will become convinced, that it is infinitely
wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a
cool deliberate manner, while we have it in our power,
than to trust such an interesting event to time and
chance. If we omit it now, some, Massanello may hereafter
arise, who laying hold of popular disquietudes, may
collect together the desperate and discontented, and by
assuming to themselves the powers of government, may
sweep away the liberties of the continent like a deluge.
Should the government of America return again into the
hands of Britain, the tottering situation of things, will
be a temptation for some desperate adventurer to try his
fortune; and in such a case, what relief can Britain
give? Ere she could hear the news, the fatal business
might be done; and ourselves suffering like the wretched
Britons under the oppression of the Conqueror. Ye that
oppose independance now, ye know not what ye do; ye areng a door to eternal tyranny, by keeping vacant the
seat of government. There are thousands, and tens of
thousands, who would think it glorious to expel from the
continent, that barbarous and hellish power, which hath
stirred up the Indians and Negroes to destroy us, the
cruelty hath a double guilt, it is dealing brutally by
us, and treacherously by them. |
50 |
| To
talk of friendship with those in whom our reason forbids
us to have faith, and our affections wounded through a
thousand pores instruct us to detest, is madness and
folly. Every day wears out the little remains of kindred
between us and them, and can there be any reason to hope,
that as the relationship expires, the affection will
increase, or that we shall agree better, when we have ten
times more and greater concerns to quarrel over than
ever? |
51 |
| Ye
that tell us of harmony and reconciliation, can ye
restore to us the time that is past? Can ye give to
prostitution its former innocence? Neither can ye
reconcile Britain and America. The last cord now is
broken, the people of England are presenting addresses
against us. There are injuries which nature cannot
forgive; she would cease to be nature if she did. As well
can the lover forgive the ravisher of his mistress, as
the continent forgive the murders of Britain. The
Almighty hath implanted in us these unextinguishable
feelings for good and wise purposes. They are the
guardians of his image in our hearts. They distinguish us
from the herd of common animals. The social compact would
dissolve, and justice be extirpated from the earth, or
have only a casual existence were we callous to the
touches of affection. The robber, and the murderer, would
often escape unpunished, did not the injuries which our
tempers sustain, provoke us into justice. |
52 |
| O
ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the
tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the
old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been
hunted round the globe. Asia, and Africa, have long
expelled her.Europe regards her like a stranger,
and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive
the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind. |
53 |
Back to
"Common Sense" Introduction and Index, by Thomas
Paine
Return
to

Join the Revolution!
| |